Startup profile for Temporal: latest funding, latest known valuation, total disclosed funding, investors, status, sources, and why the company is interesting. Part of the Venture Capital Tracker startup directory.

Startup profile · funding coverage

Temporal funding, valuation and investors

Durable execution platform — $550M Series E at $12.55B on Sep 14, 2026; Lightspeed co-led with Wellington, Goldman Sachs Alternatives, and Tiger Global. ARR dollars not disclosed.

Keep track of Temporal

Save this profile to your VCT watchlist for a quick return.

View watchlist

Funding, valuation & investors

Answer-first snapshot

Latest funding

Series E

$550M · September 2026

Latest known valuation

$12.55B

Series E · September 2026

Total disclosed equity funding

$850M

Excludes debt, grants, acquisitions, secondaries, and IPO proceeds.

Current status

private

growth · Seattle, Washington

Investors in latest funding

Lead: Lightspeed Venture Partners , Wellington Management , Goldman Sachs Alternatives , Tiger Global

Other: Andreessen Horowitz , Sequoia , Index Ventures

Sources: latest funding · temporal.io Last verified: 2026-09-15

Overview

Temporal provides durable execution primitives for distributed workflows — handling retries, partial failures, and state across long-running processes. The Seattle company, founded in 2019 by Samar Abbas and Maxim Fateev, announced a $550 million Series E at $12.55 billion on September 14, 2026. The company said Lightspeed co-led with Wellington Management, Growth Equity at Goldman Sachs Alternatives, and Tiger Global, with T. Rowe Price and SV Angel participating and a16z, Sequoia, Index, GIC, Sapphire Ventures, and Amplify returning. Reuters matched $12.55 billion and rounded its headline to $12.6 billion. Prior company mark: $300 million Series D at $5 billion post-money on February 17, 2026, led by Andreessen Horowitz. Series E metrics are company-claimed: annualized revenue run rate up more than 200% year over year; net dollar retention above 200% since February; more than 4,300 paying customers (+139% YoY); 1.9 trillion billable actions in August (+350% YoY); 43 million open-source installs; 570 employees. Named customers include OpenAI, Snap, NVIDIA, and JPMorgan Chase. ARR dollars, primary vs secondary, cheque sizes, and pre- vs post-money on the Series E were not disclosed. Wellington, Goldman, GIC, Sapphire, Amplify, T. Rowe, and SV Angel do not have Venture Capital Tracker /fund/ pages. Rillet named Temporal as a customer in its August 17, 2026 Series C post.

Why Temporal is interesting

September 14, 2026 company close: $550 million Series E at $12.55 billion — 2.5× the February 17, 2026 $5 billion post-money Series D in seven months. August 18 Bloomberg talks (~$500M at ≥$12B pre-money) are superseded. The Series E post printed usage and growth rates, not ARR dollars. Reuters $12.6 billion is rounding.

Product & use cases

Open-source durable execution engine and cloud platform for fault-tolerant workflows — used for payments, data pipelines, and increasingly AI agent orchestration.

  • Reliable AI agent and tool-chain orchestration
  • Payment and fintech workflow durability
  • ETL and data pipeline fault tolerance

Key facts

  • Sep 14, 2026: $550M Series E at $12.55B; Lightspeed co-led with Wellington, GS Alternatives, Tiger (company / Reuters)
  • ARR dollars not disclosed; run-rate +200% YoY and NDR >200% since February are company growth claims
  • Feb 17, 2026: $300M Series D at $5B post-money, a16z led
  • August 18 Bloomberg ~$500M / ≥$12B pre-money talks are superseded
  • Reuters headline $12.6B is rounding of $12.55B

Funding history (newest first)

Series E

2026-09 $550M Valuation: $12.55B
  • Lightspeed Venture Partners (lead)
  • Wellington Management (lead)
  • Goldman Sachs Alternatives (lead)
  • Tiger Global (lead)
  • Andreessen Horowitz (participant)
  • Sequoia (participant)
  • Index Ventures (participant)

Source: Read source · temporal.io

Series D

2026-02 $300M Valuation: $5B
  • Andreessen Horowitz (lead)
  • Lightspeed Venture Partners (participant)
  • Sequoia (participant)
  • Index Ventures (participant)
  • Tiger Global (participant)
  • Madrona Venture Group (participant)

Source: Read source · temporal.io

Competitive landscape

Edge: OSS adoption plus a $12.55 billion Series E on usage and NDR — the diligence gap is the missing ARR dollar, not whether enterprises run Temporal.

Workflow orchestration competes with cloud-native tools and newer durable-function startups. Temporal wins on OSS adoption and reliability primitives; cloud vendors bundle competing services.

  • AWS Step Functions incumbent

    Cloud-native workflow orchestration; single-vendor.

  • Inngest direct

    Durable functions platform; newer entrant.

  • Airflow adjacent

    Batch orchestration; less transactional durability.

Notable stories

  • August $12B talks closed at $12.55B without an ARR dollar.
  • Agent runs as distributed workflows elevate Temporal's strategic position.

Market / IPO context

Editorial / static context — not a live quote.

Related funding articles

Venture Capital Tracker pieces that cover Temporal's financing or category context.

FAQs about Temporal

Practical answers founders, operators, and investors typically search for.

Company mark as of September 14, 2026: $12.55 billion (Series E). February 17, 2026 Series D was $5 billion post-money. Reuters rounded the Series E to $12.6 billion in its headline.
$550 million Series E. Lightspeed co-led with Wellington, Goldman Sachs Alternatives, and Tiger Global.
No dollar ARR with the Series E. The company said annualized revenue run rate was up more than 200% year over year and net dollar retention stayed above 200% since February.
Open-source durable execution engine and cloud platform for fault-tolerant workflows — used for payments, data pipelines, and increasingly AI agent orchestration.
No. Private. No ticker. Stage: growth.

By Venture Capital Tracker

Last updated:

Editorial note: AI tools assisted with research, structure, or drafting. Venture Capital Tracker retains human editorial responsibility for factual accuracy, relevance, and source quality before publication.