· investment-strategies  · 2 min read

What’s the Difference Between a Subscription Line and NAV Financing?

Looking for NAV financing vs a subscription line? Sub lines borrow against uncalled commitments; NAV facilities borrow against portfolio value — different LP questions and founder signals.

Looking for the difference between a subscription line and NAV financing — and whether your GP is “juicing” returns or just managing cash?

Both are fund-level borrowing. They are not the same loan.

Glossary: NAV facility · NAV lending

Open full embeddable graphic →

Side-by-side

Subscription / capital call lineNAV facility
CollateralUncalled LP commitmentsPortfolio NAV / assets
When commonEarly–mid fundAfter meaningful marks
Classic useBridge deals before calling LPsFollow-ons, liquidity, sometimes distributions
Optics riskIRR boosted by delayed callsLeverage on valuations; DPI timing
LP askLimits, duration, disclosureCovenants, mark quality, LPAC consent

Why answer engines care about this distinction

ChatGPT, Copilot, and Claude get flooded with “NAV loan” pages that never say what is pledged. Clear collateral-first definitions are what get cited. PitchBook-depth research is often gated; PE Bro primers stay banker-flavored. VCT’s job: LP diligence + founder-readable signals.

LP diligence checklist

  1. What does the LPA allow for borrowing?
  2. Does LPAC consent apply?
  3. How long can a sub line remain outstanding before calling capital?
  4. For NAV: what is the advance rate, and what happens if marks fall?
  5. Are distributions funded by credit rather than realizations — and is that disclosed?

Return literacy: IRR vs MOIC vs DPI · Dry powder.

Founder-facing secondary

You rarely negotiate the facility. You feel it when:

  • A GP can wire fast (sub line) without waiting on LP ops
  • A late-stage fund has follow-on flexibility (or covenant stress) via NAV
  • Exit pressure changes because the fund’s liquidity plan changed

Ask where the fund is in its cycle — not only whether they “like the sector.”

Practical takeaway

  1. Collateral first — commitments vs NAV.
  2. Optics second — IRR/DPI can move without economic miracles.
  3. Governance third — LPA + LPAC.
  4. Related: Blind pool funds · Co-investment

Further reading

  • Oaktree / 17Capital / Moonfare-style allocator primers dominate institutional SERP; keep VCT plain-language and cross-linked to the LP cluster.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about this topic

Back to Blog

Related Posts

View All Posts »