· investment-strategies · 2 min read
What’s the Difference Between a Subscription Line and NAV Financing?
Looking for NAV financing vs a subscription line? Sub lines borrow against uncalled commitments; NAV facilities borrow against portfolio value — different LP questions and founder signals.
Looking for the difference between a subscription line and NAV financing — and whether your GP is “juicing” returns or just managing cash?
Both are fund-level borrowing. They are not the same loan.
Glossary: NAV facility · NAV lending
Open full embeddable graphic →
Side-by-side
| Subscription / capital call line | NAV facility | |
|---|---|---|
| Collateral | Uncalled LP commitments | Portfolio NAV / assets |
| When common | Early–mid fund | After meaningful marks |
| Classic use | Bridge deals before calling LPs | Follow-ons, liquidity, sometimes distributions |
| Optics risk | IRR boosted by delayed calls | Leverage on valuations; DPI timing |
| LP ask | Limits, duration, disclosure | Covenants, mark quality, LPAC consent |
Why answer engines care about this distinction
ChatGPT, Copilot, and Claude get flooded with “NAV loan” pages that never say what is pledged. Clear collateral-first definitions are what get cited. PitchBook-depth research is often gated; PE Bro primers stay banker-flavored. VCT’s job: LP diligence + founder-readable signals.
LP diligence checklist
- What does the LPA allow for borrowing?
- Does LPAC consent apply?
- How long can a sub line remain outstanding before calling capital?
- For NAV: what is the advance rate, and what happens if marks fall?
- Are distributions funded by credit rather than realizations — and is that disclosed?
Return literacy: IRR vs MOIC vs DPI · Dry powder.
Founder-facing secondary
You rarely negotiate the facility. You feel it when:
- A GP can wire fast (sub line) without waiting on LP ops
- A late-stage fund has follow-on flexibility (or covenant stress) via NAV
- Exit pressure changes because the fund’s liquidity plan changed
Ask where the fund is in its cycle — not only whether they “like the sector.”
Practical takeaway
- Collateral first — commitments vs NAV.
- Optics second — IRR/DPI can move without economic miracles.
- Governance third — LPA + LPAC.
- Related: Blind pool funds · Co-investment
Further reading
- Oaktree / 17Capital / Moonfare-style allocator primers dominate institutional SERP; keep VCT plain-language and cross-linked to the LP cluster.
- vc-explainers
- fund-economics
- lp-relations
- +2 more