· Investment Strategies · 3 sources

Upwind’s $300M at $3.8B: Cloud Security After the Wiz Vacuum

Bessemer and TCV reportedly led Upwind’s ~$300M Series C at ~$3.8B — more than doubling January’s ~$1.5B mark — as buyers seek non-Wiz/Google cloud security alternatives.

By Venture Capital Tracker

Editorial team

Share
Cover for Upwind ~$300M Series C at ~$3.8B — Cloud security

Bessemer Venture Partners and TCV reportedly led Upwind’s roughly $300 million Series C in early September 2026, valuing the Israeli cloud-security company at about $3.8 billion (CTech, SiliconANGLE, Globes). That more than doubles the ~$1.5–1.6 billion mark from January’s $250 million Series B. Salesforce Ventures, Greylock Partners, Craft Ventures, Cyberstarts, Leaders Fund, and Alta Park Capital participated.

Spine: Google’s Wiz acquisition created a multi-cloud buyer problem — and investors are capitalizing the clearest independent alternatives at unicorn-plus speed.

For a broader comparison of investment in cloud runtime security and adjacent security categories, see the 2026 cybersecurity funding overview.

Key facts

Company
Upwind (Israel)
Round
~$300M Series C
Valuation
~$3.8B
Co-leads
Bessemer, TCV
Prior
$250M Series B at ~$1.5B (Jan 2026)
Founder
Amiram Shachar (serial)
ARR path
Globes sources: mid-year ~$50–60M run, toward ~$100M ARR YE (estimates)
Confidence
Reported (Globes “set to raise”; CTech/SiliconANGLE sizing)

Who uses the product — and for what job

Users: security and platform teams at cloud-native enterprises that need runtime/cloud risk prioritization without depending on a vendor now owned by Google.

Job: automate detection and triage of real cloud risks (noise down, actionable alerts up) across AWS/Azure/GCP-style estates — Globes noted enhanced distribution agreements with Amazon and Microsoft after the Wiz–Google deal.

Why now

  • Wiz → Google reframed competitive dynamics: some buyers want a non-Google CNAPP path even if Wiz remains multi-cloud.
  • Valuation climb from ~$1.5B (Jan 2026) to ~$3.8B in under a year is the anomaly — pricing scarcity of scaled independents.
  • AI workloads expand cloud attack surface; automated prioritization is the purchasing language of 2026 security budgets.

Why Bessemer / TCV — portfolio fit

Bessemer is a returning lead — continuity on a cyber franchise it already marked up. TCV adds later-stage growth capital for a company crossing toward nine-figure ARR ambition. Salesforce Ventures’ presence (after a smaller intervening investment at ~$1.6B per CTech) signals platform adjacency.

Likely founder rationale: raise into the post-Wiz demand surge with existing leads who already diligenced product and GTM, rather than reset the board for a new brand-name fund.

DimensionFit
StageSeries C growth
ThesisIndependent CNAPP after category consolidation
RiskHyperscaler-native security suites; other Israel cyber peers (Sweet, Echo, etc.)

Competitive map

PlayerLane
Wiz (Google)Category leader, now strategic
Palo Alto / CrowdStrike cloud modulesSuite incumbents
Other CNAPP specialistsShare-of-wallet fight

What remains undisclosed

Exact close date wording varies (“set to” vs. closed); treat sizing/valuation as well-sourced reported until a full company release. ARR figures are Globes source estimates.

Takeaway

Upwind’s $3.8B mark is a post-consolidation trade: independence + distribution matter as much as feature parity. The number investors still need is audited ARR vs. the ~$100M year-end whisper.

Sources

  1. SiliconANGLE: https://siliconangle.com/2026/09/03/upwind-reels-in-300m-for-its-automated-cloud-security-platform/
  2. CTech: https://www.calcalistech.com/ctechnews/article/0kbwgdw01
  3. Globes: https://en.globes.co.il/en/article-upwind-set-to-raise-300m-at-38b-valuation-1001554301

Follow Venture Capital Tracker in Google

Add VCT as a preferred source to make our venture-capital coverage easier to find in Google Search.

By Venture Capital Tracker

Editorial note: AI tools assisted with research, structure, or drafting. Venture Capital Tracker retains human editorial responsibility for factual accuracy, relevance, and source quality before publication.

Related articles

See all

Frequently Asked Questions

Direct answers to common questions about this topic

Back to Blog