· Investment Strategies · 3 sources

MIND Raises $72M Series B — DLP Rebuilt for GenAI and Agents

Crosspoint Capital led MIND’s $72M Series B ($112M total). Ctech cites ~$300M mark and ~$10M ARR run rate — who uses AI-native DLP and why a cyber specialist led.

By Venture Capital Tracker Editorial

Share
MIND Raises $72M Series B — DLP Rebuilt for GenAI and Agents

MIND raised a $72 million Series B announced September 17, 2026, led by Crosspoint Capital Partners, with YL Ventures and Paladin Capital Group returning. Company-disclosed total funding is now $112 million.

classic DLP was built for email and endpoints; GenAI and agents moved sensitive data into channels legacy tools barely see — MIND is selling that rewrite, with named healthcare and media buyers.

Key facts

Company
MIND — Seattle HQ; R&D in Israel
Round
$72M Series B · $112M total (company)
Date
September 17, 2026
Lead
Crosspoint Capital Partners (~$35M of the round per Ctech)
Returning
YL Ventures, Paladin Capital Group
Prior
$30M Series A ~1 year earlier (company)
Valuation
Not in PR. Ctech / company sources: ~$300M
Revenue
PR: 17× revenue / 8× customers YoY; “eight-figure.” Ctech: ~$10M ARR run rate
Named customers
Children’s Hospital Los Angeles; National Geographic Society
Use of proceeds
Product (Stress Free DLP / AI DLP Agents), enterprise GTM, partnerships, hiring

Who uses the product — and for what job

Users: security and IT leaders who must let staff use ChatGPT-class tools and agents without leaking PHI, IP, or regulated content.

Jobs:

  • Discover and classify sensitive data across SaaS, GenAI, agents, endpoints, shares, email
  • Autonomously investigate / remediate / block via AI DLP agents
  • Keep AI adoption moving (hospital CIO framing) while blocking PHI into AI tools

CHLA’s CIO quote is the buyer voice: protect patient data without performance hits that kill AI pilots. NatGeo’s quote is the media/IP variant — label documents and see when data touches AI agents.

Why now

  • Company PR cites industry stats it attributes to the AI-adoption wave (90% GenAI deployment; weak confidence in AI data controls) — treat as cited context, not MIND’s own metrics.
  • Round timing is ~12 months after Series A — Crosspoint doubling down after an RSAC Innovation Sandbox finalist path (company + Ctech).
  • Ctech’s ~$10M ARR run rate against a ~$300M reported mark is the diligence tension: strong growth claims, still early absolute revenue.

Why Crosspoint — portfolio fit

Crosspoint is a cybersecurity specialist (Ctech notes Greg Clark / Symantec lineage; portfolio names like McAfee and Forescout). Leading ~half the round (Ctech) after a smaller prior check is a category-define bet on AI-native DLP, not a generalist SaaS spray.

YL Ventures and Paladin returning keep Israeli cyber continuity and prior diligence.

**

Investor typeWhat they bring
CrosspointCyber underwriting + Series B size
YL / PaladinPrior-round continuity; Israel/US cyber network

Strategic rationale: pick a lead that already lives in enterprise security budgets, keep existing holders whole (Ctech: no secondary), and raise enough to hire into US enterprise markets without selling the company early.

Competitive map

PlayerLane
Legacy DLP (Symantec/Broadcom, Forcepoint, Microsoft Purview)Broad suites; slower AI-channel coverage
DSPM / data security startupsOverlap on discovery; MIND pitches unified DLP + IRM autopilot
Upwind / cloud CNAPPCloud workload security — adjacent, not classic DLP
GuardioConsumer cyber — different buyer

Missing / labeled carefully

  • Valuation and ARR are Ctech-attributed, not in the PR Newswire release.
  • “Dozens of customers” vs “hundreds of thousands of endpoints” — different denominators; do not invent logo count.
  • Founded 2023 per Ctech (Hexadite / Unit 8200 pedigree) — use that over marketing adjectives.

Practical takeaway

  • Founders (cyber): Named regulated buyers beat “AI security” slogans.
  • Investors: Separate company growth multiples from absolute ARR; ask for GenAI-channel false-positive rates.
  • CISOs: Ask whether the tool sees agent and SaaS paths, not only email DLP policies from 2018.

Follow Venture Capital Tracker on Google

Add VCT as a preferred source to see more of our venture-capital reporting in Google Search.

Add as preferred source

By Venture Capital Tracker

Editorial note: AI tools assisted with research, structure, or drafting. Venture Capital Tracker retains human editorial responsibility for factual accuracy, relevance, and source quality before publication.

Related articles

See all

Frequently Asked Questions

Direct answers to common questions about this topic

Back to Blog