Conviction investing emphasizes depth over breadth—deploying substantial capital into a smaller set of high-confidence companies and often supporting them through multiple rounds.

How it works

GPs allocate larger initial checks, reserve follow-on capital aggressively, and may seek board influence or ownership targets aligned with belief in the thesis. Portfolio construction accepts concentration risk because venture returns skew to power-law winners. Conviction shows up in pro rata participation, insider rounds, and public “high-conviction” naming in memos. Contrasts with spray-and-pray seed strategies or index-like early portfolios. LPs underwriting conviction managers expect fewer investments, deeper diligence, and clearer loss ratios on non-winners offset by home runs.

Why it matters

• Founders: Alignment with a conviction investor can mean sustained support through downturns—but passing their bar is harder, and marginal fit gets a quick no.
• Investors: Fund strategy labels signal check size, ownership goals, and follow-on behavior—critical for competitive rounds.
• LPs: Concentrated portfolios increase single-name variance; diversification across managers mitigates firm-level conviction bets.

Common mistake

Confusing marketing language (“we’re high conviction”) with actual reserve behavior. Ask how much dry powder is earmarked for follow-ons versus new names and what ownership targets drive decisions.

Related ideas

Concentration risk, follow-on reserve, power law, ownership target, and thesis-driven investing relate to conviction investing practice.