· Updated · Venture Capital Tracker · investment-strategies  · 3 min read

QuantHealth’s $45M Series B: Simulate the Trial Before You Enroll Patients

Qumra Capital led QuantHealth’s $45M Series B for AI clinical-trial simulation — predicting trial outcomes before first patient in, with Sanofi Ventures returning.

QuantHealth’s $45M Series B: Simulate the Trial Before You Enroll Patients

VCT data record

Funding event facts

Source-backed financing and transaction details. Unknown terms remain undisclosed rather than estimated.

QuantHealth raises $45M Series B for clinical trial simulation

Qumra Capital led a $45M Series B into QuantHealth to scale AI clinical-trial simulation before first patient in, with Sanofi Ventures, Pitango HealthTech, Bertelsmann Healthcare Investments, and others participating.

Event type
Funding Round
Event date
Aug 4, 2026
Stage / label
Series B
Amount
$45M
Confidence
Reported

Company / target: QuantHealth

Lead: Qumra Capital

Participants: Pitango HealthTech , Sanofi Ventures , Artofin , Bertelsmann Healthcare Investments , GC Ventures , NewHealth Ventures , Shoni Top Ventures , Esplanade Ventures

Sources: fiercehealthcare.com finsmes.com

QuantHealth raised a $45 million Series B in early August 2026, led by Qumra Capital, with Sanofi Ventures, Pitango HealthTech, Bertelsmann Healthcare Investments, and others participating. The Tel Aviv company sells a blunt idea: run the trial in silico before you burn cash and patients.

Key facts

FieldDetail
CompanyQuantHealth (Tel Aviv)
Round$45M Series B
DateAugust 2026 (announced ~Aug 4)
LeadQumra Capital
Notable participantsSanofi Ventures, Pitango HealthTech, BHI, Artofin, GC Ventures, others
Prior$15M Series A (2023); Accenture strategic (2024)
Total raised~$70M+ (company / press)
Traction claim600+ simulated trials · ~30 indications · up to 90% predictive accuracy (company)

Who uses the product — and for what job

Users: clinical development, biometrics, and portfolio strategy teams inside biopharma.

Job: stress-test protocol design, endpoints, and population choices before first patient in — so effectiveness/safety failure modes show up in simulation, not Phase 3.

CEO Orr Inbar’s distinction (Fierce Healthcare): most AI in the space reacts mid-trial; QuantHealth claims to shape strategy day one via patient-level biology simulation (Katina workflow).

Why now

  • Clinical development is still where ~90% of candidates die — and where AI spend has lagged discovery hype.
  • Sponsors face capital and time pressure; one avoided failed Phase 2/3 pays for many software seats.
  • Strategic LPs (Sanofi Ventures) want tools that change decision quality, not slideware.

Why these investors — portfolio fit

Qumra (Israeli growth) + Sanofi Ventures + Bertelsmann Healthcare is a pharma-native syndicate, not a generalist AI tourist round.

Likely founder rationale: raise from capital that already understands trial economics and can open sponsor introductions — Sanofi Ventures’ Cris De Luca called simulation “an important part of the drug development toolkit.”

InvestorFit
QumraGrowth for Israeli healthtech category leaders
Sanofi VenturesStrategic distribution + clinical credibility
Pitango / BHIHealthcare specialist diligence

We do not currently list Qumra or Sanofi Ventures as /fund/ entities — treat names as press-sourced.

Competitive map

PlayerLane
Trial design consultanciesHuman experts; slower, less repeatable
RWE / claims analyticsPost-market and observational; different job
Discovery AI (target/molecule)Upstream of protocol design
CRO optimization toolsExecution efficiency after design is locked

Market signal

A $45M B with a strategic pharma venture arm returning says simulation-first trial design is graduating from pilot budgets into platform spend. Expansion plans (40+ indications; later commercial positioning) matter more than a single accuracy headline.

When not to overclaim

  • Do not equate “up to 90% accuracy” with regulatory acceptance — label it company-reported.
  • Do not confuse QuantHealth with molecule discovery AI.
  • Do not assume every indication transfers; oncology ≠ rare disease without validation.

Practical takeaway

  • Founders (health AI): Sell dollars of failed-trial risk avoided, with indication-level validation evidence.
  • Investors: Prefer syndicates with pharma strategics when the buyer is clinical development.
  • Operators (sponsors): Pilot on one asset class with pre-registered success metrics before enterprise rollout.

Sources

  1. Fierce Healthcare: https://www.fiercehealthcare.com/finance/quanthealth-raises-45m-series-b-accelerate-ai-driven-clinical-trial-simulations
  2. FinSMEs (Aug 4, 2026): https://www.finsmes.com/2026/08/quanthealth-raises-45m-in-series-b-funding.html
  3. Related: /2026-august-9-investment-news-roundup-agents-voice-health

Follow Venture Capital Tracker in Google

Add VCT as a preferred source to make our venture-capital coverage easier to find in Google Search.

By Venture Capital Tracker

Last updated:

Editorial note: AI tools assisted with research, structure, or drafting. Venture Capital Tracker retains human editorial responsibility for factual accuracy, relevance, and source quality before publication.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about this topic

Sources

  1. Fierce Healthcare — QuantHealth $45M Series B (Aug 2026)
  2. FinSMEs — QuantHealth $45M
Back to Blog

Recommended next

Browse all research »

How Much Did Adaptyv Raise? $40M Series A, No Valuation

Adaptyv closed a $40 million Series A led by Highland Europe. Y Combinator, ACE Ventures, and byFounders returned. Valuation was not disclosed. The company says throughput grew more than 5x and names Chai Discovery, Boltz, Roche, and Novo Nordisk as customers.