· investment-strategies  · 2 min read

What Is a GP (General Partner) in Venture Capital? How VCs Actually Run a Fund

GPs manage VC funds, make investment decisions, and sit on boards. Here's how they get paid, how they're evaluated, and what LPs really expect from them.

A General Partner (GP) is the person or entity that manages a VC fund — sourcing deals, making investment decisions, supporting portfolio companies, and managing relationships with LPs.

What GPs actually do

  1. Sourcing: Building deal flow through network, inbound, intro reps, and thematic research.
  2. Diligence: Technical, commercial, legal, financial evaluation.
  3. Investment Committee: Internal decision-making on which deals to fund.
  4. Negotiation: Term sheet, co-investors, board composition, investor rights.
  5. Portfolio support: Recruiting, GTM advice, follow-on support, exit preparation.
  6. Fund operations: Capital calls, portfolio reporting, LP communications.
  7. LP relations: Annual meetings, LPAC, one-off queries, fundraising new funds.

GP economics

  • Management fee: ~2% annually on committed capital (or net invested capital after investment period).
  • Carry: ~20% of net profits after LP preferred return (often 8%).
  • GP commit: Personal capital commitment of 1–3% of fund size.
  • Catch-up provisions: Often 100% catch-up to GP after LPs earn the hurdle.
  • Claw-back: LPs can recover carry if later losses offset earlier gains.

The GP career ladder

  • Analyst / Associate: 1–5 years. Sourcing and diligence support.
  • Principal / Senior Associate: Deeper diligence and sometimes sponsor deals.
  • Partner: Full investment decision authority and carry.
  • Managing Partner / Founding Partner: Fund governance, LP relationships, GP commit.

What separates top-quartile GPs

  1. Differentiated sourcing: Can they see deals others can’t?
  2. Founder feedback: Do founders actually want them in their next round?
  3. Follow-on discipline: Do they double down on winners or spray reserves?
  4. LP trust: Are LPs re-upping, and by how much?
  5. Exit outcomes: DPI, not TVPI.

Emerging manager vs established GP

  • Emerging managers (Fund I–III): Harder to raise LP capital; compete on thesis differentiation, scrappy sourcing, and direct founder relationships.
  • Established GPs (Fund IV+): Bigger fund sizes, platform teams, more LP optionality, potentially less founder intimacy.

Common GP pitfalls

  1. Fund size drift — raising too large a fund for the strategy.
  2. Team turnover — LPs re-diligence when partners leave.
  3. Style drift — chasing sectors outside of demonstrated competence.
  4. Overreserving or underreserving — follow-on strategy mistakes.
  5. Weak portfolio support — promising operational help that doesn’t materialize.

Practical takeaway

  1. Aspiring GPs: Build a verifiable track record (angel, scout, operator) before launching Fund I.
  2. Founders: Pick the partner, not just the firm — your primary GP relationship defines support quality.
  3. LPs: Evaluate the top 3 individual GPs’ tenure and alignment, not just the firm’s brand.

Further reading

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about this topic

Back to Blog

Related Posts

View All Posts »