· Updated · Venture Capital Tracker · investment-strategies  · 2 min read

Pitchbook-NVCA Q4 2025 Data for NYC: AI Dominates 65% of Deal Value, 39% of Deal Count

The Q4 2025 Pitchbook-NVCA Venture Monitor shows AI at 65.4% of U.S. VC deal value. Here's what that means for NYC's diversified ecosystem — dated snapshot, not a live tracker.

Date-stamp: This page summarizes the PitchBook-NVCA Q4 2025 Venture Monitor (authoritative quarterly U.S. VC data). It is a dated snapshot, not a live PitchBook feed or our ongoing fund tracker. Last clarified August 1, 2026.

For live-ish firm coverage after you finish this digest: fund tracker · VC directory.

Q4 2025 headline data

  • 65.4% — AI’s share of U.S. VC deal value.
  • 39.4% — AI’s share of U.S. VC deal count.
  • Dominant verticals: SaaS, AI/ML, Big Data, Mobile, Fintech, TMT, Life sciences, Healthtech, Cloudtech/DevOps, Robotics/drones.
  • Record year: 2025 set new annual records on absolute deal value driven by AI mega-rounds.

NYC implications

  1. Percentage share optics: NYC looks “smaller” when measured as % of national total because Bay Area AI mega-rounds distort totals.
  2. Absolute dollars: NYC absolute funding stayed strong.
  3. Sector mix: NYC’s diversified mix — fintech, health, enterprise SaaS, media — means Bay Area AI dominance doesn’t redefine the NYC opportunity set.

Capital concentration dynamics

The Q4 2025 data confirms:

  • Fewer, larger deals across all geographies.
  • Top-quartile deal size has grown faster than median.
  • Late-stage concentration in AI “platform” companies.
  • Early-stage remaining healthy but selective.

What NYC founders should take from this

  1. Benchmark to NYC peers, not national averages: Your Series A is competing locally for capital.
  2. Sector discipline matters: If you’re not AI-native, frame your wedge tightly.
  3. Unit economics beat hype: Capital concentration favors companies with clean metrics.
  4. Follow-on risk: Smaller firms may struggle to lead follow-on; stack reserves in cap table planning.

Fund performance data (Carta Q4 2025)

  • Smaller funds outperform larger: Sub-$200M funds beat $500M+ funds across most performance thresholds.
  • 2021 vintage struggling: Median TVPI just above 1.0x.
  • 2022–2023 vintages benefiting from corrected entry valuations.

Cambridge Associates H1 2025

  • IT + healthcare + industrials = 85% of invested capital in U.S. VC index.
  • Top-quartile IRR above 25% for enterprise software.
  • Biotech variance higher, with outsized winners possible.

Practical takeaway

  • Founders: Read the Q4 Venture Monitor each quarter to benchmark your sector — then return to fund tracker and directory for actionable shortlists.
  • Investors: Sector mix + fund size + vintage year are the three biggest return predictors.
  • LPs: Vintage-year exposure matters more than individual fund selection in some cycles.

Sources

  1. Pitchbook-NVCA Q4 2025: https://nvca.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/q4-2025-pitchbook-nvca-venture-monitor.pdf
  2. Carta Q4 2025 VC Performance: https://carta.com/data/vc-fund-performance-q4-2025/
  3. Cambridge Associates H1 2025: https://www.cambridgeassociates.com/insight/us-pe-vc-benchmark-commentary-first-half-2025/

By Venture Capital Tracker

Last updated:

Editorial note: AI tools assisted with research, structure, or drafting. Venture Capital Tracker retains human editorial responsibility for factual accuracy, relevance, and source quality before publication.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about this topic

Back to Blog

Recommended next

Browse all research »