· investment-strategies  · 2 min read

Anti-Dilution Protection: Weighted Average vs Full Ratchet, Explained

Anti-dilution protection adjusts an investor's conversion price if the company raises at a lower valuation. Here's the math behind broad-based, narrow-based, and full ratchet.

Anti-dilution protection adjusts the conversion price of preferred stock if the company later issues shares at a lower price (a “down round”). It exists to protect early investors from being mathematically penalized when later investors buy shares at a cheaper price.

The three common flavors

1. Broad-based weighted average (market standard)

Adjusts the conversion price using a formula weighted by all existing shares (common, preferred, options) plus new shares in the down round.

Formula: New conversion price = Old price × (A + B) / (A + C)

Where:

  • A = Total shares outstanding (fully diluted) before the down round.
  • B = Shares that would be issued at the old price for the down round amount.
  • C = Shares actually issued in the down round.

This is founder-friendly-ish because it spreads dilution.

2. Narrow-based weighted average

Same formula, but A includes only the preferred shares (not common + options). More protective of investors, more dilutive of founders.

3. Full ratchet

Adjusts the conversion price all the way down to the new round’s price — regardless of the amount raised. Ultra-investor-friendly, founder-punitive.

Worked example

Setup:

  • Series A: $10M invested at $1.00/share → 10M preferred shares.
  • Pre-round outstanding (fully diluted): 20M shares.
  • 9 months later, the company raises a down round at $0.50/share — $2M raised, issuing 4M new preferred shares.

Full ratchet:

  • Series A conversion price drops to $0.50. Series A investors now effectively hold 20M shares — doubling their ownership at the expense of common.

Broad-based weighted average:

  • New price = $1.00 × (20M + $2M/$1.00) / (20M + 4M) = $1.00 × (20M + 2M) / 24M ≈ $0.917.
  • Series A’s effective share count increases by ~9%, not 100%.

Difference in dilution to founders: Full ratchet creates ~10M extra preferred shares to investors. Broad-based weighted creates ~900K. That’s a 10x difference in founder dilution.

Pay-to-play provisions

A pay-to-play clause says: anti-dilution protection is available only if the investor participates pro-rata in the down round.

  • Protects the company’s ability to raise follow-on capital.
  • Penalizes investors who refuse to support the company.
  • Common in distressed rounds.

What to negotiate

  1. Broad-based weighted average (never accept full ratchet unless you have no alternative).
  2. Pay-to-play — helps future rounds close cleanly.
  3. Exceptions to anti-dilution — should exclude option pool grants, M&A-related shares, and similar non-financing issuances.

Practical takeaway

  1. Founders: Broad-based weighted average is standard and should be non-negotiable as the floor.
  2. Investors: Understand that full ratchet in a term sheet is a visible founder-hostility signal and can damage deal flow.
  3. Operators: If a down round is likely, negotiate pay-to-play upfront to avoid future pain.

Further reading

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about this topic

Back to Blog

Related Posts

View All Posts »